SalesStaff Overview
SalesStaff has a 1.9-star rating, derived from feedback provided by 11 customers. In the PR and Marketing category, it secures the 53th position out of 266 companies.
Rating
Contact Information
There are no contacts for SalesStaff yet.
SalesStaff Reviews
Anonim
Rip off!
Placed an order on 3/30/2019. Have yet to receive order even after contacting them twice. I have now disputed the charges through my bank!
Anonim
Poor results, poor service, they are not truthful, bad business
They promised to get my company forty-five meetings, they arranged for two. In the agreement we were to be refunded money if they did not achieve the contracted amount of meetings. I have tried contacting them five times with no response. Their email seems to still work but the phone numbers do not. We allowed them to do extensions anything to help them hit their target. I don't think they have anyone calling to set the meetings and this company is just scamming people. They owe my company around $15,000. No one should do business with these people they are not reputable.
Anonim
They have become thieves
Regardless of their excuses there is no other way to describe the way they are operating as anything other than thievery. They take money from clients and do not deliver and promise their employees to send checks which they do not. It is time that local and federal authorities step in and take action against their CEO and shut down what appears to have become a criminal enterprise. There is no valid excuse for what this company has turned into. If they don't have the money or resources to pay employees their back wages and former employees what they owe or deliver on what they sell then they should close their doors and face the consequences.
Anonim
SalesStaff is a Scam
SalesStaff is behind 4 pay periods in paying their employees salaries. They have created a contract which clients cannot get out of and their credit cards will continue to be be billed no matter if SalesStaff producing nothing for them and there is no cancelling per the contract language. The people running SalesStaff claim to be Christians but they are thieves, liars and manipulators Stay away from this company - the lie to their employees and make their employees unknowingly commit fraud. Giving them your credit card number will result in your getting burned - the contract you sign states you cannot dispute the charges with your credit card company.
Anonim
BEWARE - DO NOT USE - SCAM
BEWARE - DO NOT USE - SCAM Guaranteed "qualified" appointments. Have only been able to deliver 3 appointments with customers who use our product in 4 months. Asked for a refund less the cost of 4 appointments and some money for "managing" our account and have been denied. Spent months working with their team in order to get them to understand what we do even though we were told by the salesman prior to signing that they know exactly what we do because they have other customers in the same industry. If anyone is thinking about using please call me, 973 300-****x16. I would love to tell you about our experience.
Codie
Resolved: Horrible Experience
Updated by user Feb 16, 2017
The company has reached out to me and we have created a mutual resolution. Melanie has been helpful with creating a resolution.
Original review Feb 13, 2017
The entire process seems like a scam to me. From the moment we started working with them, things seemed fishy. To this date, we have spent $16,000 and seen no return on investment. I could have paid someone $3/hr in India to achieve a similar success rate. I moved to a performance based program and things just got more expensive per lead and yet we had the same results. Please do yourself a favour and stay away from this company. Their salespeople will try and talk you into anything, yet never respond if you have an issue. You're just throwing your money (and more importantly, time) out the window.
Anonim
Customer Care Review
LVP CASE ID 16-KC0020—DECISION SUMMARY Complainant, SalesStaff, LLC (“SalesStaff”), submitted a complaint in accordance with the Legitimacy Verification Program (“LVP”). The complaint alleged that Post ID 946568 (“Post #1”), Post ID 935386 (“Post #2”), Post ID 927048 (“Post #3), and Post ID 917880 (“Post #4”) contained statements in violation of Section 2 of Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. The Posts’ authors were offered the opportunity to respond to the complaint, as provided in LVP Rule 9. The materials submitted by the parties constitute the LVP Record. Having considered the LVP Record, the Third Party Neutral finds and holds as follows: Post #1 With respect to Post ID 946568 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 946568 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/they-don-t-deliver-nor-live-up-to-their-own-contract-201610****6568.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #2 With respect to Post ID 935386 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 935386 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/pay-for-performance-but-30k-upfront-201610****5386.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #3 With respect to Post ID 927048 dated September 28, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 927048 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/scam-artists-201609****7048.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #4 With respect to Post ID 917880 dated September 13, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 917880 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/ripped-off-201609****7880.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Dated: February 11, 2017
Anonim
Cost Per Meeting Review
LVP CASE ID 16-KC0020—DECISION SUMMARY Complainant, SalesStaff, LLC (“SalesStaff”), submitted a complaint in accordance with the Legitimacy Verification Program (“LVP”). The complaint alleged that Post ID 946568 (“Post #1”), Post ID 935386 (“Post #2”), Post ID 927048 (“Post #3), and Post ID 917880 (“Post #4”) contained statements in violation of Section 2 of Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. The Posts’ authors were offered the opportunity to respond to the complaint, as provided in LVP Rule 9. The materials submitted by the parties constitute the LVP Record. Having considered the LVP Record, the Third Party Neutral finds and holds as follows: Post #1 With respect to Post ID 946568 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 946568 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/they-don-t-deliver-nor-live-up-to-their-own-contract-201610****6568.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #2 With respect to Post ID 935386 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 935386 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/pay-for-performance-but-30k-upfront-201610****5386.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #3 With respect to Post ID 927048 dated September 28, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 927048 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/scam-artists-201609****7048.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #4 With respect to Post ID 917880 dated September 13, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 917880 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/ripped-off-201609****7880.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #5 With respect to Post ID 911240 dated September 1, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 911240 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/salesstaff-llc-is-terrible-201609****1240.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Dated: February 20, 2017
Anonim
Leads Review
LVP CASE ID 16-KC0020—DECISION SUMMARY Complainant, SalesStaff, LLC (“SalesStaff”), submitted a complaint in accordance with the Legitimacy Verification Program (“LVP”). The complaint alleged that Post ID 946568 (“Post #1”), Post ID 935386 (“Post #2”), Post ID 927048 (“Post #3), and Post ID 917880 (“Post #4”) contained statements in violation of Section 2 of Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. The Posts’ authors were offered the opportunity to respond to the complaint, as provided in LVP Rule 9. The materials submitted by the parties constitute the LVP Record. Having considered the LVP Record, the Third Party Neutral finds and holds as follows: Post #1 With respect to Post ID 946568 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 946568 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/they-don-t-deliver-nor-live-up-to-their-own-contract-201610****6568.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #2 With respect to Post ID 935386 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 935386 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/pay-for-performance-but-30k-upfront-201610****5386.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #3 With respect to Post ID 927048 dated September 28, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 927048 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/scam-artists-201609****7048.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #4 With respect to Post ID 917880 dated September 13, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 917880 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/ripped-off-201609****7880.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #5 With respect to Post ID 911240 dated September 1, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 911240 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/salesstaff-llc-is-terrible-201609****1240.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Dated: February 20, 2017
Anonim
B2b Demand Generation Management Software Review
LVP CASE ID 16-KC0020—DECISION SUMMARY Complainant, SalesStaff, LLC (“SalesStaff”), submitted a complaint in accordance with the Legitimacy Verification Program (“LVP”). The complaint alleged that Post ID 946568 (“Post #1”), Post ID 935386 (“Post #2”), Post ID 927048 (“Post #3), and Post ID 917880 (“Post #4”) contained statements in violation of Section 2 of Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. The Posts’ authors were offered the opportunity to respond to the complaint, as provided in LVP Rule 9. The materials submitted by the parties constitute the LVP Record. Having considered the LVP Record, the Third Party Neutral finds and holds as follows: Post #1 With respect to Post ID 946568 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 946568 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/they-don-t-deliver-nor-live-up-to-their-own-contract-201610****6568.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #2 With respect to Post ID 935386 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 935386 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/pay-for-performance-but-30k-upfront-201610****5386.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #3 With respect to Post ID 927048 dated September 28, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 927048 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/scam-artists-201609****7048.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #4 With respect to Post ID 917880 dated September 13, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 917880 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/ripped-off-201609****7880.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #5 With respect to Post ID 911240 dated September 1, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 911240 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/salesstaff-llc-is-terrible-201609****1240.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Dated: February 20, 2017
Kemberly
is terrible
LVP CASE ID 16-KC0020—DECISION SUMMARY Complainant, SalesStaff, LLC (“SalesStaff”), submitted a complaint in accordance with the Legitimacy Verification Program (“LVP”). The complaint alleged that Post ID 946568 (“Post #1”), Post ID 935386 (“Post #2”), Post ID 927048 (“Post #3), and Post ID 917880 (“Post #4”) contained statements in violation of Section 2 of Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. The Posts’ authors were offered the opportunity to respond to the complaint, as provided in LVP Rule 9. The materials submitted by the parties constitute the LVP Record. Having considered the LVP Record, the Third Party Neutral finds and holds as follows: Post #1 With respect to Post ID 946568 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 946568 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/they-don-t-deliver-nor-live-up-to-their-own-contract-201610****6568.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #2 With respect to Post ID 935386 dated October 12, 2016, it is more likely than not that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 935386 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/pay-for-performance-but-30k-upfront-201610****5386.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #3 With respect to Post ID 927048 dated September 28, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 927048 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/scam-artists-201609****7048.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #4 With respect to Post ID 917880 dated September 13, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 917880 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/ripped-off-201609****7880.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Post #5 With respect to Post ID 911240 dated September 1, 2016, it is more likely than not that the factual statements and innuendo in the Post are defamatory and inaccurate, and that the post does not report the experience of an actual consumer of the Complainant’s services, and therefore, the post violates Pissed Consumer's Terms of Use. Accordingly, Post ID 911240 found at https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/salesstaff/salesstaff-llc-is-terrible-201609****1240.html should be removed in its entirety and the URL should be changed to remove reference to the Complainant. Dated: February 20, 2017